5 Responses to “Can we really make progress for Tibet through the Chinese legal framework?”
Authors
Blog Stats
- 58,628 Visitors
Upcoming Posts
The Economy of The TAR/The Rising China/Tibetan Deities/The Yarlung Period/Origins of the Tibetan People/The Cultural Revolution in Tibet/Four Rivers Six Ranges/
Recent Posts
Archives
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (5)
- July 2009 (5)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (5)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (7)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (2)
- September 2008 (2)
- August 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (5)
- April 2008 (17)
- March 2008 (10)
- February 2008 (6)
- January 2008 (14)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (4)
- October 2007 (1)
- September 2007 (3)
- August 2007 (7)
- July 2007 (7)
- June 2007 (11)
- May 2007 (9)
Blogroll
Recent Comments
| flightchix on Guestbook | |
| Palden Rgyal on Guestbook | |
| bambi heruka on What is India’s Karmapa… | |
| Ann on Links/Similarities between Tib… | |
| Ann on Links/Similarities between Tib… |
Top Posts
- The Tibetan Wheel of Life
- The Lost Years of Jesus in Tibet
- The Tibetan Stupa
- The Younghusband Expedition (1903-1904)
- Tibetan Book of the Dead
- Being Chinese: Historically a Multiethnic Identity?
- China's Rising Military Power
- About the Sperling-Lobsang Sangay controversy
- Links/Similarities between Tibetan and Native American groups.
- Autonomy vs. Independence
- Tibetan Warriors
- The Tibetan Book of the Dead: Bardo Thodol
What do YOU think? Will it ever be possible that Tibetans will find a satisfactory solution through this very unlikely route? Seems to me, if anything, Chinese law will always work against them. Where are the signals that things are otherwise?
As far as gaining any real form of autonomy or independence, through the Chinese legal system, I don’t believe we can with this current Chinese government. I suppose it doesn’t hurt to try but I believe, like it says in some of the comments on these three articles, Chinese laws are followed by the government selectively. When they coincide with the government’s aims or help them in oppressing the people then they are followed but when they undermine the government or inconvenience them, they are ignored.
any form of genuine autonomy is a long way coming and Sperling’s article point to the difficulty ahead.Ma Rong, an influential scholar mentioned in the article have been calling on the elimination of national minority laws and creating a national identity based on “chinessness” and has further gone to state that tibetan intellectuals are a problem. While China might not go to such extent it is important to keep a vigilant eye..eg. the official use of name Tibet as Xizang..L Sangay should definately start to pay closer attention to these issues
now more than ever we need to help support preservation of the tibetan cultures and language(s) in its natural environment